What is truth?
We can say that there are two kinds of truth. Ultimate truth
and relative truth. Ultimate truth says, “I am
it. What I am is not changeable under any
circumstances.” Relative truth says, “I’m
only truth to those who think I’m truth.” Kinda
tough to really verify an ultimate truth, wouldn’t you
say? How would we ever verify such a thing? So we can
only believe we have found some sort of ultimate
truth.
What is ultimately true,
will be expressed repeatedly and by various means. It is
enduring and is forever manifest, simply because is ultimately
true. Ultimate truths have unshakable foundations and apply to all
realities. If we allow for realities to operate under very
different and even seemingly contradictory rules, then ultimate
truths must be very flexible so as to accommodate them all.
The motivation of self love and expression would be an example of
what might be an ultimate truth.
Relative truth, on the other
hand, is more the result of something we have experienced that we
have formed ideas about. In our efforts to understand our
world we created science and religion. Both serve a purpose,
but neither can give us complete answers because all systems of
thought are based upon truth as seen through the eyes of those
involved. They are based on relative truths, which cannot
ever reach the status of ultimate truth. If they contain any
ultimate truth, we cannot be certain. What they can and do
contain are ideas that we can experience for ourselves, but then we
would be wise to remember that we are in the realm of relative
truth.
So the idea of truth and
knowledge can become a great hindrance if we confuse our sense of
knowing with an ultimate truth. Remember, ultimate truth can
not be verified. All that can be verified is that our ideas
are experienceable. So truth is really more a thought or idea about
the reality of things as we see them and not really a statement
about what is true for others. What is true, is true, but
it’s also not something that lends itself to being packaged
and forced upon others.
Truth is a past dominated
way of perceiving the world. It’s derived from past
experience, ideas and feelings. Its objective is to
facilitate better functioning in the future by learning from and
understanding the past, but it is limited precisely because it is
based on past events. It does not readily anticipate what
does not fit with past experience. Understanding is an
ongoing process which changes with additional experience.
Additional experience allows for a greater understanding.
Since experience is always ongoing, so is the process of
understanding. Understanding of the past does not necessarily
mean that we will understand the future, but learning
how to comprehend our experience
will allow us to better grapple with a future that we have yet to
experience or understand.
What is
knowledge? Knowledge can be thought of as packaged ideas
about truths. It’s a workable set of ideas that we
don’t find the need to question anymore. They have
risen above their former status as an opinion or belief and are now
more authoritative in nature. It’s the idea that we are
able to understand things and eventually have sufficient insight to
feel that our understanding has a strong enough basis to take us
out of the realm of uncertainty and into a realm of
certainty. Feel it for yourself. Think “I
know.” Now think, “I believe.” Which makes
you feel the most personal strength? Usually it’s the
“I know” part. There’s just something
appealing about feeling we know something. Maybe it’s
because when we think that know something, we feel a sense that we
understand something in such a way that we can use our
understanding to achieve something we desire. Maybe
it’s just a sense of achievement. Maybe we’re
competitive and we feel we have an edge of some sort.
Whatever it is, it’s darn appealing. But it’s
also very limiting.